Member Center: Welcome, | Logout | My Account | Log In / Register | Help
heraldonline
High | Low
Currently: °
More Weather | Traffic
Customer Service
Chuckperry's picture

More McKown news

The latest chapter in the Doug McKown saga unfolded this week.

Even before his trial, folks close to this situation thought York County's coroner would seek back pay if he was found not guilty of felony drug charges.

So it’s not too surprising that McKown is finally asking to be paid for the nearly two years he was suspended from office.

McKown’s claim is that he was suspended for charges he was acquitted of. Therefore, he said Wednesday, he should be paid for the time he missed.

But county officials say they followed Gov. Mark Sanford’s orders and taxpayers footed the bill for an interim coroner. Two people shouldn’t be paid for the same job, they said, especially when only one did any work.

Kathy Williams, assistant director of the S.C. Association of Counties, called the situation “highly unusual” and said most officials who are suspended from office are found guilty of the charges that caused their suspensions.

That’s obviously not the case here.

State law doesn’t address back pay, Williams said. But a 2004 legal opinion from the state Attorney General’s Office seems to answer the question.

That opinion was about the state's former Agriculture Commissioner Charles Sharpe, who was sentenced to two years in prison after admitting he took $10,000 to protect a cockfighting operation.

Before Sharpe’s conviction, the question of back pay was raised. Specifically, would he get it if acquitted? The attorney general’s office said no.

Although that opinion is based on case law, it is still just an opinion, one McKown and his lawyers don’t share.

Readers, what do you think? Should McKown collect? Or is the county right in not paying him? Please share.

Michaelprocton's picture

If the charge was the only reason for the suspension...

He absolutely deserves his pay. As his team says, without the charges, he's working as normal and, yes, earning that pay.

Always remember...don't let FACTS get in the way of your argument...

McKown Back Pay

I am so glad the York County Government has no intention of giving McKown backpay. They paid someone else to do his job while he was out of office to defend his poor judgement. It is bad enough he got his job back we don't need to add insult to injury and make the citizens of York County pay him backpay. He got off not because he was innocent but because he had a good attorney and the witnesses were poor. He is as guilty as they come. This case reminds me of OJ Simpson. Everyone knows your guilty and you get away with it.

As far as I am concerned the fact he admitted to the Ethics Board that he committed numerous Ethics Violations for his own personal gain should have been enough to keep him out of his job.

You are who you hang with. He kept company with drug dealers and users. He admitted he knew his live in girlfriend was both. He still let her live in his home. That is not the type of person York County needs to hold a government paid job. Anyone who holds a elected public office should be held to higher standards. The police found the illegal drugs in his home (fact). The police taped him in the process of a drug deal (fact).

He is an embarassment to York County and himself. I hope when he is done with his term he sells his home and moves to another county!!!

wandafincher's picture

Bravo again

Bravo again.

Nicole Seaford is 100% correct. Just because the jury was not convinced, does not make the facts disappear. Most of the citizens of York County know better than to believe that Dougie is innocent. Law enforcement did its job well. The rest was up to the prosecutor and the Jury of Dougie's peers. Sometimes the truth does not count for much.

My grandmother always said if you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas. Eventually the fleas have to be dealt with. Coroner is an elected position. The citizens of York County have control over the future election of coroner. Make it count for something.

McKown

Sorry he doesn't deserve any back pay. The jury may have aquitted him. But in my mind that doesn't mean that he is innocent of the charges, it just means that the witnesses brought against him were not believable to the jury.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.