Member Center: Welcome, | Logout | My Account | Log In / Register | Help
heraldonline
High | Low
Currently: °
More Weather | Traffic
Customer Service
Enlighten's picture

Legacy of a Lunatic

Enjoy!

The Legacy of a Lunatic

by Nance Greggs

As our nation readies itself to celebrate the end of the Bush presidency, discussion of his legacy fills the airwaves. The usual suspects – the pro-Bush pundits, the PNACers, the air-headed teleprompter readers passed off as journalists – now gather together on the political talk shows, ready and more than willing to tackle the formidable task of rewriting history.

Bush's legacy, according to those still reluctant to embrace reality, will be a presidency replete with incredible foresight and heroism, all recognized by the historians who, at some later date yet to be announced, will at last recognize the extraordinary vision of one George W. Bush in the fullness of time.

However, what the dead-ender cheerleaders fail to take into account is that Bush's legacy, like that of all presidents, will be based on the facts and not the quickly cobbled-together fictions spun by his still adoring fans.

Perhaps the most glaring reality of Bush's presidency will be the fact that it was never a true presidency at all. The result of selection rather than20election, it was marked not by sound strategy, but by stagecraft; not by purposeful action, but an endless array of photo-ops meant to capture merely an image of leadership in a constant attempt to
obscure the truth that no such leadership ever existed.

While the smoke-and-mirrors experts continue to proffer their own creation – the man with the bullhorn in the wreckage of the Twin Towers, the man landing on an aircraft carrier declaring that the mission had been accomplished, the man sharing Thanksgiving dinner with his troops – the reality lurking behind the curtain is less than heroic or honorable: a lackadaisical fool reading a children's book in the midst of mayhem, a smirking coward parading around in a flight-suit, a mindless, uncaring clown offering a plastic turkey to the men and women
he was about to send to their deaths.

From the beginning, Bush surrounded himself with incompetent cronies, yes-men, and sycophants with a lust for influence, and handed out positions of power to people whose blind loyalty was the only measure of their suitability. Qualities like honesty and strength of character were never assessed, and were in fact an obvious hindrance for those
who aspired to the inner circle.

Once foisted on the world stage, Bush invariably chose the role of the mindless puppet, a buffoon prone to inappropriate laughter, absurd remarks, displays of childish petulance, all washed in a thin veneer of down-home charm meant to hide the underlying ignorance, the lack of awareness, the inability to conduct himself as anything more than an over-indulged frat-boy who had no more respect for his office than qualification to hold it.

In the wake of the events of 9-11, the Bush administration touted itself as the protectorate of our national security, yet another meaningless slogan behind which to hide the already-in-place machinations of war, the suspension of citizen's rights and freedoms, and the lining of those pockets deemed deserving by those in control of the purse-strings.

Despite the fact that Bush's policies have made us infinitely more vulnerable, the Protecting the Homeland banner still waves as though having some actual meaning behind it, another empty gesture in place of reality – like flag-pins meant to convey true patriotism, or Support the Troops bumper-stickers meant to convince the masses that our
military is actually treated fairly and honorably.

Americans are a forgiving people, and had the disastrous results of Bush's policies been due to a mistaken anticipation of their end result, or lofty ideals that ultimately proved to be misguided in their application, the absolution of his countrymen would have been offered without question.

But as we have all sadly seen, the suffering that we as a country, and the world at large, now endure is not the result of things gone inexplicably awry, but the single-minded pursuit of a political ideology whose sole purpose was to enrich the few at the expense of the many, and to place power into the hands of those who would stop at nothing to maintain it, all to be achieved while blithely ignoring the ensuing consequences; irreparable damage, escalating violence, economic instability, and the deaths of millions.

A large part of Bush's legacy will undoubtedly be his administration's ability to spin the worst behavior into something noble, the most blatant lies into something too truthful to be questioned, the most heinous crimes into something heroic, all couched in language meant to divert the mind from reality, and the soul from guilt.

Terms like "executive privilege", once used to protect the presidency from sharing sensitive information that could place us in jeopardy, have been twisted into poltically-convenient catch-all phrases behind which crimes can be covered-up and its perpetrators shielded from justice. The term "torture" has been replaced with "enhanced
interrogation techniques", a newly-coined sound byte intended to mask the barbarism in which we now wallow with impunity.

Even the once respected term moral Christian has been forever tarnished, having now been attributed to a torturer, a warmonger, a widow-maker, a non-repentant creator of orphans, of limbless soldiers, of multitudes of homeless, hungry, sick and dying people whose fate is of no concern to one who is not ignorant of, but blatantly dismissive of
the very teachings he pretends to follow and revere.

Perhaps the most enduring part of any president's legacy is the remembrance of their most obvious personal quality. In this instance, surely Bush will be best remembered for his arrogance – an arrogance born not of an overly-exuberant recognition of his own abilities or record of accomplishment, but merely reflective of a sense of
entitlement to be praised for that which he never achieved, and rewarded with adulation and respect that was clearly never earned.

Ultimately, history is not written by scholars assessing the past from afar. It is passed down to children and grandchildren by those who experienced the events firsthand, an oral history that lives and breathes long after the pages of even the most well-researched tomes are reduced to dust.

And the tales that will be told of Bush's presidency will be rife with tragedy; tales of soldiers who died fighting not for freedom but profit, of cities left to drown amid apathy and incompetence, of corporations given free rein to exploit the vulnerabilities of a nation's people, of an administration that plundered our treasury, saddled us with unconscionable debt, circumvented the rule of law, and left our Constitution in tatters.

Despite the best efforts of the revisionists, the spinmeisters, the propagandists, and those simply unwilling to admit that they20were hoodwinked by an inept scoundrel and his attendant snake-oil salesmen, it is the truths of George W. Bush's failed presidency that will be the basis of his legacy.

In light of that fact, Worst President Ever might be the kindest title that history eventually confers.

This is on Youtube.

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Devastating_New_YouTube_Video_John_McCain_s_Neverending_War_2

Bennyd030653's picture

Exactly right

You are absolutely correct enlighten. Welcome back!

Benny

Bennyd030653's picture

Where do you get your facts

Why are your the "facts" you state unemotional and non-manipulative? Most of the "facts" you state are really opinions. As opinions you have a right to them. You don't have a right to the facts! Yes, the facts on 911 are there to see. You can even download the 911 Commission report, something you must not have read. Yes, the Clinton Administration has some blame but it is also a fact that Dick Cheney refused to pull together the team on terrorism as instructed by Bush as he had more important energy meetings to hold. It is true that Republican, anti-Clinton FBI agents in Washington spent thousands of hours running errands for Ken Starr and chasing Monica Lewinsky and did not follow-up on field reports that would have led any competent police force to stop 911. You say George Bush did enough for the economy. Does that include not vetoing one single spending bill passed by Republican dominated House and Senate for 6 years. Does that include taking a surplus and turning it into the largest deficit ever. Matter of fact, what exactly do you think Bush did for the economy?

Yes we blame Bush. I blame the little coward for sitting still for 8 minutes after being told the country was under attack. I blame him for repeatedly lying to the country in order to take it to war. I blame him for being an International criminal guilty of engaging in unprovoked warfare. I blame him for putting an incompetent political hack as the head of FEMA and then patting him on the back and saying "you are doing a heck of a job, Brownie", while corpses lay on the streets of New Orleans.

You get your opinions not your facts!

Benny

Enlighten's picture

I would like to thank

all of you who blindly followed this fool down the path of lies and destruction, then actually voted for him again.

Thanks from my children's grandchildren who will surely being paying the price for this failed "presidency."

A legacy indeed.

your welcome

Enlighten is something you do not do with any of these statments. You yourself are a spinmisters and yet you condemn those that do for someone else.
I do not agree with the economic choices of Bush, but as far as those about the war and of the Katrina incedient (which you mentioned yourself or for others by proxy). The war is something that should have taken care of by previous presidents that were to cowardly to do so. The facts and proof of the numerous incedents that led up to 9-11 are there for all to see. As far as the Katirna ordeal, the govenor of that state was contacted by the presidents office and offered that help to get its people to safety but was turned down by the govenor. Then Bush gets blamed for the states own lack of concern for its people and when the truth is brought out, they still re-elect the same person to office. It is so much easier to stand back and blame one that has the weight of our entire country for every little mistake he has made. Yet, I bet you think Clinton was such a good president even though he was not man enough to admit his mistake and leave it at that. He instead had to lie and waste millions of tax dollars for his attourney's fees to debate over the meaning of the word "is".
Gorege Bush may not have been the best president he could have been but he has not been the worst. I think that he has not done enough to help the economy, and does have his own agenda with the oil BS that has been going on. But, as for our troops and what they are dealing with; I think he has been trying to the right thing.
If you want to enlighten use facts not emotionally charged adn manipulative crap as the media does.

Enlighten's picture

Nothing to be proud of

But that's ok.

Like to remind you, no name calling. LOL

Spinmisters? It would be hard to beat the cut and paste republicans around here but in answer to some of your post:

"The war is something that should have taken care of by previous presidents that were to cowardly to do so."

Do you mean Bush the first should have gone all the way to Bagdad? What would that have accomplished? Or is this yet another thinly veiled statement of Bill's inadequacies? Your statement still fails to own up to the fact that no weapons of mass destruction were found and no Iraqis attacked us on 911.

Sorry, I agree with the writer of the article I posted. History will SHOW precisely just how bad Dubya was.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.