Member Center: Welcome, | Logout | My Account | Log In / Register | Help
heraldonline
High | Low
Currently: °
More Weather | Traffic
Customer Service

Confederate Flag

Could everyone concentrate on something that deals with our every day lives? I for one am for the flag staying. The NAACP boycotted the state of South Carolina for the removal of the flag from atop the statehouse. Now that it has been removed from the top, they are still not satisfied. Now it has to be placed indoors. If it was placed inside a building, the next thing we would hear is that it's violating the NAACP's civil rights everytime a member goes into the building and sees it. Enough already! If you don't like the flag, don't look at it! Just like if something is on a t.v. channel that you don't approve of, change the damn channel!!

The Confederate Battle Banner is a symbol of heritage not hate.

I have heard so much about this issue for years now. First, it was demanded off the dome of the capital. Now, it is demanded to be taken off the grounds completely. It is claimed to symbolize racism, ignorance, and oppression. Guess what? The NAACP is now a symboly to me and every true NON-racist, educated son of a confederate veteran to be the real symbol of racism, ignorance, and oppression.
The NAACP used to be a good organization. They used to truly fight for those that were being wronged and mistreated. Now they are nothing more than a bully without a clue. They pick up on ANYTHING that has claimed to be racist againt any person of African-American descent no matter if the cause is right or righteous. Martin Luther King, Jr. would be udderly appalled at what this group has turned into today.
The Confederate Battle Banner was a symbol for confederate troops to rally under during a time of war. Its design was that of a people fighting for what they thought was right. States rights, and industrialization; NOT slavery and oppression as the biggest racist this country every had Abraham Lincoln wanted the people to believe. It is a symbol to a descendant of a Confederate Vetran of the sacrifice that was being made to secure a better future for us.
The NAACP and anyone else that claims to be educated and claims that the Confederate Battle Banner is a symbol of racism and ignorance should truly get to the REAL story of the history around this matter. Otherwise they prove themselves to be either racist, ignorant or both. The Confederat Battle Banner is a symbol of HERITAGE NOT HATE. If this contiues I think the NACCP should have a class action law suit brought against them for slander, and defimation of character of all confederate soliders and their decendants.
If the excuse that the KKK carries the banner when they march, guess what? They also carry a Holy Bible, a christian flag, an American flag and the flag of whatever state they are in. To single out this banner is proof that the NACCP is picking on the minority group of those symbols to attack, the sons and daughters of confedarate soldiers.
It is time the NACCP gets over this crap, opens their eyes and find a just cause to fight. Stop being racists, ignorant to the truth, bullies, and most of all stop going back on thier word. The monument on the house grounds was accepted as a comprimise to it being on the state house dome. Now, they want to go back on their word because they have nothing better to do and feel the need to get their name in the news.

Bennyd030653's picture

Sorry, but it was slavery!

You can dislike the NAACP all you want but you just can't make up new history. All this revisionist writings about states rights (it was only important because it let them keep slavery) and whatever else people say caused the war, they always seems to skip over one very important point.

The Confederate states wrote articles of secession and passed them in their legislatures. They used these to define why they were seceeding and why they would fight to do so.

You can read the one passed by the idiots in our SC Legislature here:

http://facweb.furman.edu/~benson/docs/decl-sc.htm

You see I believe what they said when they said that slavery was paramount to them and no one would ever stop them from holding human beings in bondage.

I too had ancestors who fought for that flag and just like fine men today in Iraq, my dirt poor ancestors got duped into fighting and dying for the rich to hold slaves.

If you think our articles are not enough, you can easily find all of them for the entire Confederacy online. They sure as hell meant to be fighting for slavery!

Benny

Enlighten's picture

Can't wait to see their answers

I came to the same conclusion years ago when I actually read the articles of confederation for myself. There was no other conclusion to come to: The South fought the war to preserve slavery because they needed to economically but also felt it was their god-given right to do so.

I always said that the south fought for states rights about as much as the north fought to preserve the union. Neither statement is true. In the north state after state was outlawing slavery because of the religious right. Funny that the party that brought us John Brown is now bringing us Dick Cheney...

We need to move forward, we have bigger fish to fry, so to speak. I supposed you could post proof all you want and there will still be those who insist that states rights is why the war was fought. Sad.

Thanks for the post, can't wait to read the responses.

JaneSmith_RN's picture

Benny, Looks like you're absolutely correct

I don't see how anybody reading the actual articles of secession can draw any other conclusion. I have quoted from the document you cited the specific parts that most succinctly make your point.... although people ought to read the entire thing to assure themselves that I have not cherry picked out of context to prove my point:

http://facweb.furman.edu/~benson/docs/decl-sc.htm

[p25]
For twenty-five years this agitation has been steadily increasing, until it has now secured to its aid the power of the common Government. Observing the forms of the Constitution, a sectional party has found within that Article establishing the Executive Department, the means of subverting the Constitution itself. A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. He is to be entrusted with the administration of the common Government, because he has declared that that "Government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free," and that the public mind must rest in the belief that slavery is in the course of ultimate extinction.

[p26]
This sectional combination for the submersion of the Constitution, has been aided in some of the States by elevating to citizenship, persons who, by the supreme law of the land, are incapable of becoming citizens; and their votes have been used to inaugurate a new policy, hostile to the South, and destructive of its peace and safety.

[p27]
On the 4th of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States.

[p28]
The guaranties of the Constitution will then no longer exist; the equal rights of the States will be lost. The slaveholding States will no longer have the power of self-government, or self-protection, and the Federal Government will have become their enemy.

[p29]
Sectional interest and animosity will deepen the irritation, and all hope of remedy is rendered vain, by the fact that public opinion at the North has invested a great political error with the sanctions of a more erroneous religious belief.

[p30]
We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved, and that the State of South Carolina has resumed her position among the nations of the world, as a separate and independent State; with full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent States may of right do.

They weren't seceding over the rights of states to issue their own postage stamps; they were seceding over the rights of states to allow their citizens to own slaves.

It boils down to the next administration due to be sworn into federal office was against slavery and was determined to stamp the practice out within the borders of the United States. SC saw this as an assault on their rights and used its impending action as its rationale to declare itself separate.

Fighting for "States rights"? Yeah... sure.

Bennyd030653's picture

the truth is right there

It always pays to read what the people of the time said, not the way it is described by the later day revisionists.

Thanks,
Benny

wandafincher's picture

never a truer statement benny

Hey, you are right on target with this one. I could not agree more. (can you believe we have found a common ground?)I love true historical fact.

Let's ascribe this "rule" in general to everything written by people of the times at different eras in history.

Let's take other writings at face value and not try to read innuendos into the wording of other documents.

Sometimes, things ARE just as they seem -- regardless of how unbelievable it may appear to future generations.

daughter of promise

Enlighten's picture

Sorry

But the flag we are speaking of has been used by hate groups for a very long time now and is a symbol of hate and racism whether or not you want to believe it.

I have nothing against honoring the past. But lets put it all where it belongs, in a historical setting.

Yep, the troops carried the Christian Flag and the Bible. does that mean we should post them and force them into the lives of every American?

This country is a country of Religious Freedom and that does not mean just for Christians, it means everyone.

The flag is an issue I wish would die, like aborition. It detracts from the real issues of the environment, the economy, education, and dirty politicians. It has been used and abused by those who hate (on both sides) and it is time to lay it to rest.

Time to evolve and move on.

Great-Great Granddaughter of a Confederate Soldier who gave his life serving the Confederacy.

IS The U.S. Flag-"The Stars And Stripes-Old Glory"-A Hate Flag?

Is the U.S. flag--the Stars and Stripes a hate Flag? The answer is a resounding NO. It represents Freedom and Democracy.

However it flies over the murder by abortion of an estimated 50 million babies. It flew over the genocide of the American Indians and millions died. It (and the colonial flags of Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, and New York that pre-dated it) flew over the ships of Yankee slave traders for 200 years. It flew over an illegal and unconstitutional invasion of the Southern states from 1861-1865 during which Union soldiers committed murder, plunder, theft, arson, and rape on a huge scale which was planned and condoned by Union officers and president Lincoln. During World War II it flew over the bombing of Dresden Germany which was a cultural and population center and not involved in the war effort. Thousands of innocent children died. It could be compared to the Nazi flag as the human rights violations and atrocities committed under the Stars ans Stripes exceed that of Nazi Germany and the Swastika flag. Yet, amazingly it is the Confederate flag that is being compared to Nazi Germany and the Swastika. The U.S. flag and the Confederate flag are not judged by the same standards and held to the same level of accountability. It is indeed amazing that the Confederate flag which represents a decentralized limited government acting only in defense against invaders is compared to a totally centralized government bent on world conquest. The Confederate States of America and Nazi Germany were polar opposites.

Although most people do not realize or give it much thought, the results and consequences of Southern defeat and surrender in 1865 which ended the War for Southern Independence (War Between the States or Civil War) affect us on a daily basis.

One of the many consequences was the destruction of States Rights. America was founded primarily by Southern gentlemen from Virginia as a Constitutional Federal Republic composed of a limited Federal Government and sovereign states. The 10th Amendment states "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited to it by the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."

The Federal Government has forced the "Right to Abortion" upon unwilling Southern states. Christian Confederate leaders would never have voted to allow the mass murder of unborn children and they would not have appointed renegade activist judges to the judicial system.It is estimated that 50 million babies have been murdered under the U.S Flag (Old Glory-The Stars and Stripes).

NO- the U.S. flag--the Stars and Stripes is NOT A HATE FLAG. As previously stated it represents Freedom and Democracy. Likewise the Confederate flag is NOT A HATE FLAG--it represents limited constitutional federal government, states rights, resistance to tyranny, and Christian values and principles. It is a grave injustice to call either flag a HATE flag or to compare either flag to the Nazi Swastika. Both should be respected for positive reasons.

Bennyd030653's picture

What?

You write, " America was founded primarily by Southern gentlemen from Virginia as a Constitutional Federal Republic composed of a limited Federal Government and sovereign states." I think John Adams, Samuel Adams,John Hancock, Benjamin Franklin, The Minutemen, the soldiers of New England at Bunker Hill, Ticonderoga and on and on might disagree with that rather silly little statement.

The Confederate Flag stood for slavery and the war was to perpetuate slavery and if your family had been the slaves you would not think so lightly of the subject.

The right of abortion is a really silly argument there buddy, you want the government to enforce your will on a womans body and the majority of Americans think that is crazy. It is not that you dislike government power you just want it for yourself so that you can impose your morality. What next, do you want to go back to the fun old slavery days Masser?

Benny

Yankees Acted As Nazis

Slandering the Confederacy

One often sees attacks in the press on the Confederacy,
comparing it to Nazi Germany and its battle flag to the swastika. Such
ignorant analogies are highly offensive, especially to those of us who are
Jewish, and demonstrates little knowledge about either the Confederacy or the Nazis.

Over 3,000 Jews fought honorably and loyally for the Confederacy, including
its Secretary of War and later State, Judah Benjamin. My great grandfather also
served, as did his four brothers, their uncle, his three sons, and some
two dozen
other members of my Mother's extended family (The Moses' of South Carolina
and Georgia).

We know first hand, from their letters, diaries, and memoirs, that they were not
fighting for slavery, as is so often and falsely alleged, but rather to
defend themselves and their comrades, their families, homes, and country
from an invading army that was trying to kill them, and burn their homes and cities.

If you want to talk about Nazi-like behavior, consider the actions of a leading
Union commander, General Ulysses S. Grant, whose war crimes included the
following:
Ordering the destruction of an entire agricultural area to deny the enemy support
(the Shenandoah Valley, 5 August, 1864).
Leading the mass murder, a virtual genocide, of Native People, mainly helpless
old men, women, and children in their villages, to make land available for
the western railroads (the eradication of the Plains Indians, 1865-66).
What we euphemistically call "the Indian Wars" was carried out by many of
the same Union officers who led the war against the South -- Sherman,
Grant, Sheridan, Custer, and other leading commanders.
Overseeing the complete destruction of defenseless Southern cities,
and conducting such warfare against unarmed women and children (e.g., the
razing of Meridian, and other cities in Mississippi, spring, 1863).

And we Georgians know all too well of atrocities by the Union forces, especially that of General William T. Sherman on his infamous
"March to the Sea" through Georgia and the Carolinas, in which his troops
routinely burned, looted, and destroyed libraries, courthouses, churches, homes,
and cities full of defenseless civilians, including my hometown of Atlanta.

It was not the South but rather our enemies that engaged in genocide and
other war crimes. While our ancestors may have lost the War, they never
lost their honor, or engaged in anything that could justify their being
compared to Nazis. It was the other side that did that. .
Sincerely yours,

Lewis Regenstein
Atlanta, GA

Bennyd030653's picture

Honor

How much honor was there in fighting to perpetuate bondage?

Benny

wandafincher's picture

good comment Benny

daughter of promise

Yankees Guilty of Treason

Traitor, according to Noah Webster's 1828 dictionary:
One who violates his allegiance and betrays his country; one guilty of treason; one who, in breach of trust, delivers his country to its enemy, or any fort or place entrusted to his defense, or who surrenders an army or body of troops to the enemy, unless when vanquished; or one who takes arms and levies war against his country; or one who aids an enemy in conquering his country.

Treason, according to Noah Webster's 1828 dictionary:
Treason is the highest crime of a civil nature of which a man can be guilty. Its signification is different in different countries. In general, it is the offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance, or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power.

Traitor, according to The Random House College Dictionary 1984:
A person who betrays another, a cause, or any trust; a person who betrays his country by violating his allegiance

Treason, according to The Random House College Dictionary 1984:
violation by a subject of his allegiance to his sovereign or to the state

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, here are the definitions of treason and traitor. We, as Confederates, members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, Southerners, Southrons, oftentimes read/hear of our Confederate ancestors referred to as traitors. Most of the time, we wince, get our feelings hurt, or as the P/C crowd says "offended", and move on. Recently, one Southern lady informed us through the valuable Demastus newsletter, A.K.A. Southern Heritage News and Views {SHNV}, that some yankee man called all Confederate soldiers "traitors" and that she "did not appreciate his remarks". In my estimation, she should have slapped his face! HARD!! Because, he just insulted her and her children, calling her family the descendants of traitors.
Here is why we are not the descendants of traitors. First, the Southern States democratically withdrew from the voluntary union of States, based upon a compact they had made with each other to guide their "common government" and to help them settle any disagreement they may have with each other. This "compact" is called the Constitution of the United States of America. Without now going into the details of this "compact" suffice to say these were "the rules" by which all signatories agreed to live by, as regard the other States. And, they understood that if the "compact" was broken on one point, then the whole thing was broken.
Was George Washington a "traitor"? As a British subject, he most certainly was. The English law, first clearly stated in the Statute of Treasons (1350) included this, "and to wage war against the kingdom". Source: http://www.answers.com/topic/treason. Also, it included this, "prohibited levying war against the king, adhering to his enemies, or contemplating his death." So, clearly, the whole of the 13 British colonies that were established in the "New World" and constituting what we now call "the 13 original States", were guilty of treason. Because they did wage war against the kingdom, they did levy war against the king.
Are we to hold our Confederate ancestors to the same standard? Did they "wage war against the kingdom", i.e. the U.S. government? Did they "levy war against the king", i.e. president lincoln? According to Article 3 of the Constitution it thus provides that treason shall consist only in levying war against the United States or in giving aid and comfort to its enemies and that conviction may be had only on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or on confession in open court. By that definition, are Mexicans traitors? Because of a little incident in U.S. history referred to as "the Mexican War, 1846-1848"? What about the Germans who waged war against the U.S. in 1917-18 and again in 1942-45? What about the Vietnamese, the Iraqis? Obviously, these countries' people have given aid and comfort to our enemies.
So, is this starting to get ridiculous? Of course it is. So is calling our Confederate ancestors "traitors". Because, the various Confederate soldiers, if they had been in the employ of the U.S. government, if they had been soldiers and sailors of the U.S. army and navy, they resigned their places so that their honour and integrity may be maintained. At that point, they became private citisens of their respective States, not soldiers of the United States armed forces. Therefore, the stain of traitor could not be levied against them. The United States army took up arms against the sovereign States who had just declared their individual independence. As men who had military experience, they offered their swords, their very lives, in the defence of their States.
Those very States who sincerely believed that their future, as sovereigns, lay out of this union with an outlaw, rogue nation, and instead, belonged with the several Southern States, all of whom had kindred spirits, the spirits of liberty. They democratically withdrew from the voluntary union of sovereign States, then joined together, in common cause, a new union, a Confederate union. All of this was done within the highest ideals of the democratic process.
Treason? No!
But, was there "treason"? Was there "rebellion" in the U.S. in the 1860's? Are not we the ones who point out it was the president of the United States, abraham lincoln, who violated his oath of office by violating the Constitution of these United States? These are ten distinct violations of the Constitution by Abraham Lincoln: Coercion in 1861. Article IV.— Laws of Neutrality -- Trent Affair. Article VI, Clause 2 -- Violation of International Law.— Writ of Habeas Corpus Suspended. Article I, Section IX, Clause 2.— War Declared Without the Consent of Congress, 1861. Article I, Section VIII, Clauses 11, 12.— Emancipation Proclamation. Article IV, Section III, Clause 2.— West Virginia Made a State. Article IV, Section III, Clause 1.— Freedom of Speech Denied. Vallandigham Imprisoned in Ohio. Amendment One.— Blockading Parts of States that Were Held by the Federal Government to be Still in the Union.— Liberty of the Press Denied. Amendment One.— Violation of the Fugitive Slave Law. Article IV, Section II, Clause 3.
With all these clear and distinct violations of the Constitution by the Commander-In-Chief of the armed forces of the United States of America, would it be a stretch at all to declare that it was the yankee soldiers who were the traitors? By virtue of and connection to, their highest leader? If it be their leader who leads them into the paths of unrighteousness, to do harm to the Constitution, to do harm to the nation, to do harm to its citisens, can they, the yankee soldier, be called the good guy, the patriot, the "American hero"? Was it not the yankee soldier who rounded up the old men, women and children of Roswell and New Manchester, Georgia onto train cattle cars and shipped them north only to dump them off north of the Ohio River to be on their own? Was it not the yankee soldier who killed more than fifty thousand Southern civilians in a four year war, almost as many American soldiers who died in Vietnam in a fifteen year war? Was it not yankee soldiers who destroyed the Shenadoah Valley, causing the yankee general to boast that a crow flying over would need to carry provisions?
I could go on and on about the treachery of the yankee soldier.
Therefore, I conclude that for now on, we refer to the yankee soldier as the traitors. No more will our enemies call us traitors, by extension, because we honour our brave Confederate/American ancestors, who stepped up to do the right thing, placed their lives on the line in the defence of the ideals of the Founding Fathers. No more will their base charges of treason go unanswered, no more will they ridicule their bravery, scorn their patriotism and laugh at their motives without being challenged. Remember my friends, if the whole world believes in wrong, does that still make right, wrong; or wrong, right? Remember these words from Charles C. Hemming from Volume IV, page 149 of the compiled Confederate Veterans Magazine, published by Broadfoot Publishing, "One hundred years from now, when the mists of prejudice and the unfairness of a beclouded history shall have passed away, it will be counted an honor supreme to have descended from such gallant men."

At Your Service,
I Remain Respectfully,
Jimmy L. Shirley Jr.
SCV Camp 1599
James Patton Anderson
West Palm Beach, Fla.

Confederate Principles Important

The Confederate States of America and the Old South was a classical civilization with colleges and universities, art and literature, world class architecture, politics with superior statesmen, and a fine military. It was driven by slave labor just as the classical civilizations of Egypt, Greece, and Rome were. Regardless, slavery was a dying institution and virtually all educated Southerners knew this. It had ended peacefully in the rest of the Western Hemisphere but in America the Northern radicals, fanatics, zealots, and industrialists used it as a scapegoat to attack and subjugate the Southern states for the cause of empire and to exploit the South's resources. The famous English writer Charles Dickens stated " The Northern onslaught upon Southern slavery is a specious piece of humbug designed to mask their desire for the economic control of the Southern States". The Confederacy deserves to be honored, remembered and respected.
The Confederate Flag and the United States Flag are judged by different standards and criteria, and are not held to the same levels of accountability. In analytical science and weights and measures, comparisons are made against known standards. However, in politics comparisons are never made in a fair and impartial manner.
Political Correctness has been used to attempt bans of The Confederate Flag from schools, parades, public and private property, and even historical monuments and sites.
The Confederate flag represents Constitutional Limited Federal Government, States Rights, Resistance to Government Tyranny, and Christian Values and Principles. To say that it represents racism and bigotry is a negative and shallow interpretation comparable to saying the U.S. flag represents the genocide of the American Indians and abortion.
Hypocrisy, ignorance, and bias have been directed against the Confederate Flag. Compare the U.S. Flag (Stars and Stripes). The genocide and racial cleansing of the American Indians took place under the U.S. Flag. Their land was taken without fair and just compensation. Indians died by the thousands as they were forced on to reservations and subjected to starvation and deadly diseases. In the American West, cavalry troopers murdered entire villages including babies in their mother's arms.
Slaves were imported from Africa to America primarily by five Northern States: New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. New York City had the second highest slave population in America. The Confederate Flag was not involved in the importation of slaves. Finally, the U.S. Flag flies over a nation that has murdered an estimated 50 million babies by abortion.
Yes, the CSA had the institution of slavery but most were treated well and it was a dying institution prior to the war. White factory workers in the North were not treated as well as most Southern slaves. For proof of this view the movie "Gangs Of New York". Yes, various hate groups have misused and abused the Confederate flag but they have done the same to the U.S. flag. The Confederate flag is 180 degrees diametrically opposed to Globalism, Socialism and Secular humanism. That is the real reason globalists, socialists, and atheists want to ban it. The infamous Communist Vladmir Lenin coined the term "Useful Idiots". The Socialist Karl Marx stated "People separated from their heritage are easily persuaded". Many Black Americans and White Liberals who are opposed to the Confederate flag have been indoctrinated by those who would convert America to Total Socialism and Secular Humanism. They have been told that the Confederate flag represents a painful reminder of slavery and racism and bigotry and that they should be offended by it. They are being used as "useful idiots".

Bennyd030653's picture

Proof

For historical proof you cite a movie! Unbelievable.

Benny

Enlighten's picture

1491

Have you read it? Slavery has been around a long, long time. Biblical, in fact and in deed. However you try to make honorable some very dishonorable people. You cannot deny that the confederacy was formed to preserve a way of life. You cannot deny that white people were scared to death of freeing the blacks because there were far more blacks in the south than whites.

Yes, there was slavery in the north, a whole lot that started with the capturing of Native Americans who were shipped off to be slaves in England and France and or held on board ships till they died of European diseases. New York was New Amsterdam and the Dutch were very good at obtaining slaves.

The puritans first home in Mass. was in an abandoned native village. A shipmate wrote home to his mother that the trail leading up to the settlement was "littered with the bleached out bones of the dead (natives)." So you see revision of history is rampant. Were you not taught that the peaceful Pilgrams set forth on Plymouth rock and had the first thanksgiving dinner with the natives as a show of friendship. What few natives left were pretty much alone because the population had been almost totally wiped out. But that does not stop us from celebrating thanksgiving.

Your conclusion that all Black Americans and White liberals want to convert this country to complete socialism is wrong but after reading some of your other posts I suppose it would be futile to argue with you. Let it suffice to say that as an AMERICAN I honor and respect your position and your right to believe whatever fairy tale you wish. My great-great grandfather lost his life fighting for the confederacy at the second manassas (he died on August 30, three days after he was wounded).

I cannot tell you why he fought for I know that he had no slaves, was of mixed heritage himself (melungeon). To say that I knew would be a lie. I was not there, you were not there so all we have is the fact that change came slow to the south, war or not.

Useful idiots? there seems to be a lot of those around here.

wandafincher's picture

there you go again, En

You stated some facts of history and spoiled it by being insulting and ending your post with more spewing of hate. Shame on you oh bitter one.

L&K to Y&Y

daughter of promise

Enlighten's picture

Biter not bitter

See wanda, there you go again. No useful commentary just name calling and spewing of your christian hate talk. Shame on you oh bitter one cause I ain't bitter I am a BITER!
Be careful for your fate is in the hands of your savior and I am turning in a bad report on you. LOL

what is L&K to Y& Y?

wandafincher's picture

what hate talk????

You are the one who spewed the hate talk......not me; there was no mention of Christianity in my posting. Again, you are either delusional or so anti-Christian that it has affected you ability to think and reason. Dangerous.

Love & Kisses to You & Yours

daughter of promise

Thank you Mr. King

I truly thank you for your vivid and just description of this issue. I have researched on my own the truths that surround this issue for many years now and found that the masses are blinded to the truth that you have shown here. As a son of many confederate veterans, God Bless you and thank you.

John David Williams

wandafincher's picture

Thank you Mr. King

Mr. King,

WOW! Awesome post........but what a sad commentary on our times and on the history of our country. I appreciate your thought provoking clarification of this topic. You have certainly given us reason to question exactly why we have believed what we have believed about the rebel flag all these years. Thank you for the illumination.

daughter of promise

Bennyd030653's picture

Wanda

Wanda, did you read the Articles of Secession? If not, please read why the states declared they were leaving the Union. The King letter is a total revision of history.

He says most slaves were treated well. Do you think you can enslave a human being and then claim to treat them well? The argument that the factories up North were worse, well Wanda, you don't usually go for two wrongs making a right.

I'll be happy to post a site (there are many) that offers all of the Confederate States Declarations of Secession. Every one of them cite slavery. They do mention state's rights, but only to say that their right to slavery is threatened.

How can anyone today still be trying to justify slavery?

Benny

wandafincher's picture

beats me Benny

In my opinion, there is no justification at all for slavery. I did read the articles and I agree that the focus revolved around the right to own slaves. To me, the confederate battle flag exemplifies this. It is a harsh reminder of the hard-heartedness and greed of mankind during the civil war era. I have never agreed with it being flown on any government property. It belongs in a museum, along with other "enemy flags". To see it flying over government property, to me, makes it seem like the issue of owning slaves is still open for debate by the states -- which, of course, it is not. Most folks I know find the flag's presence offensive. I realize that you didn't ask about the flag......but it's a topic that personally hits a sore point with me.

I do not doubt that most slaves were treated "well" -- much like work animals were treated well -- because humane treatment would allow for better performance and increased productivity by the slaves.However, no amount of humane treatment by a slave owner could mimimize the fact that
a human being's rights to freedom had been stripped away. Many of the slaves endured unspeakable crimes against them and their families. There can never be a valid excuse for that. Human beings are not chattle. They are not property to do with as we wish.

As far as the northern factories being bad......I do not doubt that the working condtions in the sweat shops were deplorable. But, what does one have to do with the other? 'm sure the argument is that there were many similarities between slave labor and sweat shop labor. You are correct: two wrongs do not make a right.

BTW, did you see my post to AgentKandel??

Also, my post to Mr. King was not saying that I agreed with what he said. I thought he gave reason to seriously think about the issue.

daughter of promise

Bennyd030653's picture

I did see your ;ater post

I saw that and appreciated it. I was ytoubled understanding ryour compliment to King?
I was confused. Hey, I already said I am old!

Benny

Enlighten's picture

no need to read

and understand anything cause Wanda has God on her side Benny.

When I read Mr. Kings comment about how well the slaves were treated I had to laugh out loud. Remember, the framers of the articles of confederation were the same people who used the Bible to "conquer" this wild and untamed and "uninhabited" wilderness presented to them by that very same "God." They needed no other reason than their superiority in the eyes of their God and they need none now. Like you said, to even think that you can enslave another human being and say you are treating them well is a falicy, to say the least.

What no one likes to talk about is the fact that well into the 1960's, slavery still existed in the form of Jim Crow Laws but that truly is another subject, sort of.

Mr. King and his friends can have all the "fun" they want trying to relive those fun filled Gone with the Wind days while they reinact their battles. Makes you wonder if they ever let the confederacy win...there seems to be more reinactors than the original army.

Have a good one.

wandafincher's picture

are your panties in a wad

are your panties in a wad again??

daughter of promise

Enlighten's picture

Wanda's panties

no, are yours? I believe I made some very valid points and this is what you come back with.

Grow up and put on your big girl panties. Remember, be careful what you ask for and have a nice day, bless your little old heart!

wandafincher's picture

En, did you come to my neighborhood?

En,

Yesterday evening, a pick-up truck decorated with very large swastikas drove slowly down our road. I felt more than a little uneasy.

Was it you?? If so, how did you find me??

Enlighten's picture

Juvenille

of you, to say the least but you are proving my point quite nicely.

Seems you may be the one who is writing checks you can't backup...to put it nicely.

PS Must have been one of your friends, my friends don't hate and frankly I am in no mood for this today as I just found out that a dear friend was hit on a bicycle last night by a drunk driver and is brain dead. Of course you wouldn't care because he was gay. The world has lost a bright light and heaven is welcoming home a favored son.

In honor of all Jesse was and will always be, I say for him to you wanda: Stick it where the sun don't shine. OK?

hoodornament's picture

Understanding

Enlighten:

Certainly my heartfelt prayers go out to your friend, his family and friends such as yourself in this time.

Knowing the situation, I understand the emotion that you displayed in this post.

May all find peace in the days and weeks to come

Enlighten's picture

Thanks Hood

They are taking him off life support as we speak. My heart is broken but I was lucky to be able to call Jesse friend and will miss him greatly.

Still don't get the nazi comment from the other but can't deal with that right now. Yep, emotional and if I offended anyone, sorry.

Thanks again.

Keep Confederate Flag flying - Don't Tread On Me

Good Gosh Gerdie...People, get a grip...if you don't like The Confederate Flag on SC capitol grounds....don't look at it. I am a G.R.I.T.S girl...Girls Raised In The South...and I am sick of the banter about OUR CONFEDERATE flag not being "politically correct" for the vast majority.
The Confederate Flag is a part of our southern heritage, and anyone that would want to ban this flag from public display must have "insecure personality issues" I value the presence of the Northern "Union Jack" flag as much as the Confederate Flag. Both flags have much history that deserve respect. I had ancestors that engaged on the Southern side, others on the Northern side in the Civil War. Just like today, back then, people had their opinion and chose to engage in the fight for their beliefs.

Think about this...our SC State Flag...Crescent Moon and Palmetto Tree..this flag was created in 1775 by Col. William Moultire during the Revolutionary War. The SC State flag that flies over the state of SC today is of the same design that flew over the independent SC during the Civil War. Put that in your pipe and smoke it! Don't wanna hear that you are "traumatized" by our South Carolina State Flag...get over it...grow a pair....MAN UP!

Bennyd030653's picture

What is it that we are proud of?

As a native and life-long Carolinian (other than while in the Navy) I would like to know why we are supposed to be proud of that flag or our Southern heritage. I am not proud that my state was a slave holding state. I am not proud that my state's legislature of the time (made up as always of wealthy men) were so afraid of losing their human property that they worked like, well, slaves, started a war that very few of them would fight, none of them in the fron lines. I am not proud that their stupidity led to 600,000 Americans losing their lives. I am not proud that their stupidity led to the south spending a 100 years in poverty and degredation trying to overcome their folly. I am not proud that in 1970 and 1971 I watch some of today's "leaders" wave that flag at black kids who were trying to get an education. I am not proud of what they shouted as they waved that flag. And if I was black, You would have to lock me up for burning the piece of crap.

Benny

wandafincher's picture

C'mon AgentKandel -- fight like a girl!

I too am a GRITS girl. So, I think I am qualified to speak my mind about the controversial flag issue. For you to say, "just don't look at it" is extremely unfair.

Sweetheart, please understand that this issue has nothing to do with political correctness, but it has everything to do with flying the flag of an enemy nation on government grounds -- paid for with MY tax dollars.

It would be no different if we erected the German swatiska or the Japanese flag on U.S. government grounds. They were our enemy in war -- and they lost the wars.

See, our state flag that you referenced is STILL our state flag. The confederate battle flag is not and never has been our state flag -- so why fly it on the grounds of our state capitol -- it just does not make sense.

Besides, it's not like it was always there. Some think it was there from the beginning...........but I can remember in 1967, when the flag was planted atop the capitol building by Democrat Ernest F. Hollings.... and the fight began again.

I am not traumatized by the flag....but I am offended by it being flown on OUR country's government grounds. If you want to fly it in your yard, on your house, on your car, on your head, on your clothing, or on your person -- I do not care -- because it is your right to do so. However, it is not your right to infringe upon my right to have only the flags of OUR state and OUR country on OUR government grounds.

My husband served in the U.S. Marine Corps and my father and grandfather both served in the U.S. Army -- so that people like you can have the freedom you have to display whatever you like on your own personal property, not to mention, so you can even have your own personal property.

To fly an enemy flag on government grounds is a slap in the face of those brave men who sacrificed their lives to keep us free. It is an insult to those who gave their lives for the United States of America during the civil war and in every other war involving the U.S.A.

If you want to commemorate the lives of those who fought on the confederate side during the civil war, then, by all means -- do it. Fly it over their graves if you wish; put it on their tomb rocks; or better yet -- leave the flag in the museum, where is belongs -- in history -- along with other U.S. enemy flags.

Enlighten's picture

Credit where credit is due

Have to agree with you here Wanda. Truth is stranger than fiction.

I have stated many of the same objections when this subject came up last year. It is sad that "we" allow a symbol of our disunion to be flown at all.

I am with you 100% on this one. Fly it in your home, your car, your private property all you want but don't use my tax dollars to fly it in my face.

Have a good evening.

wandafincher's picture

Goodness sakes! she agrees

Goodness sakes! she agrees with me 100%

Who would have ever thought it??

daughter of promise

Bennyd030653's picture

Nice Post

Good Wanda.

Benny

wandafincher's picture

thanks Benny

I'm trying to catch up on a few posts that I may have missed this past couple of days. It's been a busy time, but I am getting to it.

daughter of promise

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.